At Magazine Offices, Another Summer of Jitney No-Shows


By LAUREN LIPTON
Published: July 20, 2008

THINGS were touch-and-go at Glamour on July 3. Many employees at the magazine’s publisher, Condé Nast, had the go-ahead to leave work early for the long holiday weekend. But for those toiling feverishly on Glamour’s September issue, the possibility was up in the air until the last minute. By the time Ayana Byrd, an articles editor, left at 5 p.m., the elevators that Glamour shares with magazines including Portfolio, Vanity Fair and The New Yorker felt deserted.

In their July and August issues, Glamour features the perfect $795 beach hat; O, The Oprah Magazine, shares recipes for an alfresco dinner party; and Vogue suggests a Caribbean getaway. It’s time to relax and have fun. Except, that is, for the employees at women’s magazines, who every summer find themselves languishing in the office towers of Hearst, Condé Nast, Time Inc. and other publishing companies.

At stake are the fashion-packed, advertising-filled September and October issues, which ship to the presses in July and August and are always subject to such intense scrutiny by top editors and their corporate bosses that late changes are almost guaranteed. This year, as the women’s publishing sector contends with declining advertising in most cases, and smaller staffs and major design changes in some, there is an unwelcome new twist: the traditional half-day on summer Fridays is starting to look like an endangered species.

An industry tradition that for years let publishing employees leave by lunch for the Hamptons Jitney or a drive upstate is being canceled this season at Martha Stewart Living. Instead, the company is giving employees two Fridays and the week off between Christmas and New Year’s. At Elle, summer hours that until last year went into effect on Memorial Day weekend now don’t start until July. And at In Style, which unveiled a major redesign on Friday with its August issue and is still closing the September one, summer hours are being considered on a “week by week, hour by hour” basis, said Charla Lawhon, the managing editor. “Everyone is much more on the ground this year because we have more work to do.”

To be sure, busy summers are not new at women’s magazines, and most employees understand that they come with the job. Although fall is an important time for all magazines, women’s titles are particularly dependent on advertising from fashion designers and retailers, who take advantage of the change of seasons to tout their collections to readers generally eager to get out and shop. Vogue, for example, does about 20 percent of its annual advertising business with the September issue, said Thomas A. Florio, senior vice president and publishing director of the Vogue group.

But with April, May and June ad pages sharply down at most women’s fashion and beauty magazines, there is more pressure than usual to do well this fall. Some publications, like Glamour and In Style, are redesigning their magazines. Skittish advertisers are also making more editorial demands. “It’s definitely pushed up a notch — ‘feature my clothes, do a profile on me,’ ” said Carol A. Smith, senior vice president and group publishing director of Elle, where ad pages were up for April, May and June over the same period last year.

At Seventeen, the September back-to-school issue had about 25 percent more pages than a normal issue, with no additional help other than an army of summer interns. “It’s a brutal grind,” said Ann Shoket, the magazine’s editor in chief. “When Friday afternoon rolls around, I can hear everyone’s cellphones ringing, and I see the resignation in their faces because we’ve got to ship more pages.”

Ms. Byrd, of Glamour, had her strategy figured out this year. She left for a two-week vacation in late April, before her magazine’s fall issues started production, editing and turning in her stories before flying to a wedding in Greece. “When I came back, we had a new creative director,” she said — and a complete redesign of the magazine. That meant Ms. Byrd had to rethink and rework articles that she had thought she’d finished. “You come back from vacation like, la-di-dah — oh, O.K.,” she said.

This year, Ms. Shoket took work with her to the Hamptons on Fourth of July weekend. (“It’s the chic new accessory — page proofs,” she said.) Cindi Leive, the editor in chief of Glamour, said she hasn’t had a Fourth of July since 1992.

Still, another tradition in magazine publishing — top editors leaving early while underlings are left behind — hasn’t entirely been overturned. Earlier this summer, the glass hives within the Hearst Tower on Eighth Avenue buzzed with drones working late, yet Amy Gross, the editor in chief of O, could be seen going down the lobby escalator more than one Thursday afternoon, a bright yellow rolling bag in tow. (Ms. Gross, who retired this month, traveled often on business, said a spokeswoman for the magazine. “If someone saw her with a suitcase, that would not have been the least bit unusual,” she said.)

While publishing companies attribute the changes in summer hours to everything from fluctuations in printing schedules to, at Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, increased business in both its media and retail areas, publishing insiders suspect other forces are at play. In the tough economy, it’s more about squeezing as much as possible from fewer employees, some say, and jobs are so scarce that nobody is going to complain.

Shea Daspin is one who’s not complaining. An intern at Interview and new to the city, she has worked long hours on the culture magazine’s September fashion issue. “Obviously I like to get out when it’s light out so I can go for a run or something, but I don’t mind if my internship takes up my whole day,” she said. “I don’t go to the Hamptons or anything.”

Fashion and beauty magazine employees also get perks those at other companies don’t enjoy. In Style gives its people summer goody bags, which this year included books, bronzer and a Rihanna CD. At Marie Claire, Joyce Corrigan, senior editor at large, said that the beauty department is always setting out free sunscreen and that there is “a ridiculous amount of chocolate around to keep the energy up.”

Still, some can’t shake the feeling that summer shouldn’t be this way. An intern at Condé Nast is envious of friends with internships in other fields. “They’re out having their cool New York summer,” the intern said in an e-mail message. “Those of us in the magazine world are here past dinner, and then by the time we leave are far too tired to go out drinking. I guess it’s a good thing. It’s an honor that they take us seriously enough to work us this hard. But, man, I’d love a nap.”

Read More......

Paris Couture Catch-Up

By TESS GOLDEN

The Chanel couture show at the Grand Palais in Paris. (Getty Images)

The ancient ritual of Paris’s couture shows began yesterday. (Note to the uninitiated: it’s much more haute not to use the h-word in connection with couture.) And while the one-of-a-kind superfrocks on the runway will never find their way into a boutique, die-hard fashion followers won’t want to miss a single bow. To keep you apprised, we’ve pulled together a digest of what’s being reported on the fashion wires. Here goes.

Chanel (above)

Organ-inspired tubes “dangled from a dress like gothic car-wash strips.” (International Herald Tribune)
“The kind of canny mix that has made the ponytailed Lagerfeld designer a pop culture icon.” (Associated Press)
“With clothes like these, who needs accoutrements?” (Fashion Week Daily)
Christian Lacroix. (Reuters/EPA)

Christian Lacroix

“Only a dull mind could ask for any literal explanation.” (Style.com)
“Minimalists be warned! This is not for you.” (Telegraph)
“Fit for a latter-day Marie-Antoinette.” (Associated Press)
“Even the most jaded observer forgets that these are clothes. They just have too much heart to be, technically, inanimate.” (Fashion Week Daily)
Christian Dior. (Reuters/EPA)

Christian Dior

“Irrepressible touches of perversity.” (Style.com)
“If couture offers fairy-tale gowns, however, there was something here for both its good and deliciously wicked characters.” (The Independent)
“Underlying the attention-seeking transparency, however, was a meticulous attention to sculptural cut and architectural shape.” (Telegraph)

Armani Privé. (Getty/Reuters)

Armani Privé

“The Power Woman, he seemed to say, is still around, but her hard-won confidence allows her to work a softer, more glamorous, look.” (Women’s Wear Daily)
“Softening the androgyny of the pantsuit and bringing peace to fashion’s gender warfare.” (International Herald Tribune)
“He neatly consigned the dour look of corporate uniform to the past.” (Style.com)
“Everything the well-dressed and well-heeled wealthy woman of today could conceivably want in her wardrobe” (Telegraph)
Givenchy. (EPA)

Givenchy

“The designer took his collection into the high heartland of Peru, where he created a landscape of Machu Picchu colors like tobacco brown and stony beige.” (International Herald Tribune)
“‘Young, modern, and urban take on chic dressing, punctuated with incisive tailoring and a flair for intense shots of decoration.” (Style.com)

Read More......

Paris Couture: Smoke & Roses


By CATHY HORYN

One of the haute-couture pieces designed by Alessandra Facchinetti for Valentino.
Alessandra Facchinetti showed her first haute couture collection tonight for Valentino. It was held in the Place Vendôme showroom of Valentino, a little more intimate than most places here. She did a great job. This collection was so much more interesting than her ready-to-wear show, and, of course, you might expect something a little higher up for couture. But there was more expression and feeling—more work—in this collection. The first outfit was a little strange, in my opinion—a white silk jacket with an egg-shaped skirt. The proportions looked off to me, and the whole thing looked strained.

But things moved along. There are a lot of architectural clothes—stiffened edges curling, the back of a jacket pointing out, some modified egg shapes. These looks showed a range and a bit of willingness to try new things, and they were a good contrast to the softer dresses—by far my favorite things. She had one simple dress (#2) that was in pale taupe chiffon with some mohair ruffles, and another loose dress in smoky brown chiffon that was open and slightly ruffled around the neckline. Very pretty. Her embroidered suits were gutsy—very Valentino but fresh looking. I thought she completely captured the sense of Valentino but made it more youthful. I can imagine lots of women, young or old, being interested in the clothes. As I said, I’m not wild about some of the architectural effects—they were a little fashion-schoolish. But mixed in with the dresses and the smart suits, they’re fine.

On the whole, I found the season a little weak. I loved Chanel, mainly because I like Lagerfeld’s weird tangents. You just have to go with it and enjoy! The collection seems on the darker Germanic side, and I honestly don’t know how much the pipe-organ theme really mattered to him in the end. His mind seems to go everywhere…

Dior was a pleasure to watch. The colors were beautiful, the fabrics light, and of course I was glad to see a change of direction from Galliano. I kept thinking that most of the suits and dresses would look better, more interesting, if he reduced them down—cut them away, so to speak. Dior is romantic, and Galliano has shown us things before he thought were contemporary. The Matrix collection, for sure. The hobo show. And the couture collection based on dance. What separates them from this show in terms of a contemporary point of view? And how do you make romance look contemporary? I hope he stays on this track, but leaves behind more of the retro Dior bits. I don’t think he needs them.


Givenchy was disappointing. It didn’t seem couture to me: too many things like motorcycle jackets and denim pieces that had been tweaked to seem more “designed” than they actually were. I mean, after Raf Simons’ men’s show last week you have look at his standard of introducing new shapes and then ask if Tisci is really showing us something different. The stuff is on the surface.

The Gaultier show was funny and strange, a kind of toast (I think) to science fiction and lasers. I don’t know. It was all over the place. Some great classic pieces, and some of the tubular evening dresses were OTT.

Read More......

Paris: Showing Off

By CATHY HORYN
The French are feeling as economically pinched as Americans, but I get the sense they are busting to look fashionable. I’ve noticed it all day as I go around to shows and look at people on the streets. Heading to Montmartre, I saw a young woman—20s, thin, medium height—in a pair of slim gray shorts that ended mid-thigh, a loose navy popover top, and a classic pair of black stilettos. Super chic. I’ve seen slim-fitting shorts with a sailor front, worn with chunky black sandals and a cream silk blouse. The look is tailored and sexy. And there are lots of women in mini skirts; this afternoon I saw a woman in a flaring navy cotton skirt with a red and white striped polo shirt. The best-looking dress at the moment seems to be a dark tunic. I’ve noticed a lot of the guys in the front row also wearing shorts, especially as a kind of nerd school-boy uniform with knee socks and maybe a pastel vest and a tie. And it’s a little surprising how many shows have hats—the porkpie, the scarecrow, the snap-brim. Shades of next summer…

Read More......

The Paris Accord


By CATHY HORYN
Published: July 3, 2008

PARIS
ANNA PIAGGI, the eccentrically painted and plumed editor at Italian Vogue, opened her red parasol at the Chanel haute couture show and sat under it. This was, technically, inviting bad luck, for she was indoors, under the glass dome of the Grand Palais. The sun beat down.

It was like a bell jar, and we were all plants. Ms. Piaggi sought shade, her little red parasol as vivid as a laser dot.

In contrast to high summer and the Paris girls in skimmy dresses, Karl Lagerfeld’s embroidered couture tweeds could not help but seem as heavy as six dusty volumes of Thomas Mann brought down from a forgotten library shelf. Plop! Here you are, fashionable people. Digest this!

A great Chanel collection from Mr. Lagerfeld is not necessarily an interesting collection. It often lacks interior drama, personal obsessions or the weird assertions of an individual mind. At whatever age Mr. Lagerfeld claims to be, he has the right, and certainly the ability, to make his audience uncomfortable — even to disappoint them — if it means he can try on a new idea. As a couturier, he doesn’t have to justify himself. As Mr. Lagerfeld, he doesn’t have to explain.

He says he found the theme for his fall collection, shown on Tuesday, in some organ music. The shape of the pipes inspired the fluted pleats at the waists of gray tweed dresses and dark wool coats, and the bellows may have given him the idea for lavishly puffed sleeves. A gold-embroidered coat overlaid with black strips of fabric in a chevron pattern could have been taken from the ornate wood front of an organ.

Yet, on some level, you can imagine that tubular shapes — vermicelli fringe — would drive him up the wall. The heavy tweeds, the needle-like embroidery and the Germanic darkness seem to come from other, more interesting places in his imagination. A good many effects in this collection will seem strange, like a long dress with short sleeves shaped like square seat cushions or a short silk dress with a turtle back of densely gathered tulle. But you wonder if they are strange only to us because we lack some depth of imagination or culture.

Mr. Lagerfeld said he was going to Dubai this weekend to work on an interior design project. (He did a Fendi show on the Great Wall last year.) And he said that Chanel now has some Russian couture clients who buy 30 to 35 pieces a season. By what impulse today would Mr. Lagerfeld think small and dainty? This might explain his fascination for monolithic backdrops and bold, if puzzling, silhouettes.

A contemporary Dior is a conundrum. It seemed obvious from the full swells and simple lines, the fresh clear colors and subtle embroidery, that John Galliano wants a change. On Monday, he jettisoned the extreme retro shapes and cross-cultural references of the last few years for ultra-feminine dresses and architectural tailoring.

Waists were cinched with leather corset belts, and some jackets had stiff, curving peplums that flared over slim chiffon skirts. Lisa Fonssagrives, the late wife of the photographer Irving Penn, was a reference, and in the outline of some of the black jackets or a slim pastel evening dress draped with billowing yards of silk, you could detect her influence.

But fresher and cleaner doesn’t make Dior contemporary. It just makes it seem, well, less retro. The thing is, we don’t know what makes romantic Dior look up-to-date. Mr. Galliano has defined it in so many different ways. One hopes he will stay on this track, cutting down the shapes even more and moving the romance away from the past.

Last season, Mr. Lagerfeld and Jean Paul Gaultier both looked to the sea for inspiration. Today, Mr. Gaultier had tubular loops of fabric running over shoulders and around hems. It’s not that wonderful an idea. Mr. Gaultier’s fur coats came caged in leather straps, and tunics and knits with flaring hems evoked a comic-book futurism. Not all the classic Gaultier tailoring seemed on the same planet as laser-colored tube dresses, but it was a fun show.

“A Trip to Machu Picchu,” Riccardo Tisci’s collection for Givenchy, aimed to be contemporary. There were bomber jackets in boiled cashmere and waxed leather, cool skirts, Bermudas in stone-washed denim worn over silk jersey leggings, and some draped cocktail dresses in violet silk satin. And several ensembles in striped boiled wool, as well as a vest of woven yak hair, had Machu Picchu written all over them. But Mr. Tisci doesn’t reveal anything with his designs. It is not clear that he has actually designed something so much as taken conventional shapes and tweaked them and called them couture.

“From shadow to asphalt,” Christian Lacroix wrote in the sketchy notes for his show on Tuesday at the Pompidou Center. Only a colorist and a romantic like Mr. Lacroix could find so much variation in black. The collection was heavenly — mysterious through and through, with black in shiny and matte fabrics, paired with its close cousin navy, lightened with Chantilly lace, and often shot with a burst of color.

As somber and smoothly finessed as some of the tailoring was — close-fitting black jackets with subtle embroidery or an edge of creamy silk at the neckline — it was countered with lush skirt volumes. The effect looked fresh. A dress with a beige-pink silk top, its cap sleeves glazed with crystals, had a pleated overskirt with shadowy black stripes. Off in its own Lacroix world was a short slim dress with a front of patchwork felt.

Read More......